Legal Opinion

Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Borden Coal Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1923No. 6 Div. 282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamfobh, J.

1 The plaintiff’s mule left the corral, was gone about 45 minutes, and on its return was found to have been injured in the manner described in the complaint. It was tracked and traced to a point on the track of the Southern Bailway. where the circumstances proven indicated it had been injured by a locomotive running on that track. The facts proven made the fact of injury by a train or locomotive on the track of the Southern Bailway a question for the jury. So. Ry. Co. v. Hudson; 16 Ala. App. 271, 77 South. 421; So. Ry. Co. v. Blankenship, 14 Ala. App. 261, 69 South. 591. The cases above cited…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mobile, J. &. K. C. R. R. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. McQueenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Shirley v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. South Brilliant Coal Co. v. McCollumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. BlankenshipAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API