Legal Opinion

Velazquez v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 27, 2001No. 1838994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Eduardo Velazquez (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of rape, in violation of Code § 18.2-61. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in allowing a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) to (1) give expert testimony regarding the cause of the victim’s injuries and (2) testify regarding the ultimate fact in issue and (3) in finding the evidence was sufficient to prove his guilt. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

Under familiar principles of appellate review, we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the prevailing party below,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Hoke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Moore v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. Combs v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Velazquez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. State v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API