Legal Opinion

United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 5, 1987No. Civ. No. 81-813-REPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REDDEN, District Judge:

Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LP) moves for summary judgment on its third defense and counterclaim for improper conduct by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), its fourth defense for violation of due process, and its fifth defense for *963unclean hands. Alternatively, it moves for remand of this action to the FTC. I deny the motions for summary judgment, and grant the motion for remand.

Plaintiff United States (U.S.) moves for summary judgment on the fourth, fifth, and sixth defenses (mitigation), arguing that they do not bar, toll or avoid the imposition of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Oklahoma Operating Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. EngmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API