Mejia v. Era Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants should not have been awarded summary judgment dismissing the complaint *817insofar as asserted against them because they failed to submit evidence in admissible form in support of their respective motion and cross motion is without merit (see Mazzarelli v 54 Plus Realty Corp., 54 AD3d 1008 [2008]; Felberbaum v Weinberger, 40 AD3d 808, 809 [2007]).
The plaintiffs alleged that the injured plaintiff tripped and fell over a hole in a parking lot owned by the defendants Era Realty Co., Edward Cohen, and Robert Cohen (hereinafter collectively the Era…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mazzarelli v. 54 Plus Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Robinson v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Brewster v. Five Towns Health Care Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Sanchez v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Castillo v. Wil-Cor Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Martin v. I Bldg Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Savarese v. CerrachioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Castillo v. Wil-Cor Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gulshen Kurtishi v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.