Legal Opinion

City of Waterville v. Hughan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Marshall District Court. Action by Alex. ELughan and John McDowall, as partners, who had judgment at the August Term 1875. The City of Waterville, ~ defendant, brings the case here. All the facts and proceedings are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

"Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by Hughan & McDowall against the city of Waterville, for work, labor and materials furnished by them to the city upon a certain written contract entered into between the parties for the construction of a certain dam on the defendant’s land across the Little Blue river. The plaintiffs allege in their petition, among other things, that they constructed said dam in accordance with said contract, and that the value of their labor and materials furnished amounted according to the contract to the sum of $7,871.85;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. West v. CameronSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Central Branch Union Pacific Rld. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API