Budd v. Morgan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Willis I. Morrison, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.
This is an action by plaintiff for damages for the alleged alienation by defendant of the affee tions of one Orris 0. Budd, the plaintiff’s husband. The amended and supplemental complaint alleged that the plaintiff and said Orris 0. Budd were, and ever since the fourth day of March, 1901, had been, husband and wife, and stated in detail the acts and conduct of the defendant alleged to have caused and resulted in such alienation. The defendant in her answer denied, for want of knowledge, information, or belief, that plaintiff was lawfully or otherwise married to said Budd, or that they are or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murchison v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Del Campo v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Commonwealth v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Chandler v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. HarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Freeman S. S. Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.