Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Pillsbury
California Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1916No. S. F. No. 7329PublishedCited by 16 opinions
APPLICATION originally made to the Supreme Court for a Writ of Certiorstri to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Review to consider the award of the Industrial Accident Commission under the following findings of fact:
“1. That Henry E. Trobitz, applicant herein, was injured by accident on the twentieth day of June, 1914, while in the employment of defendant Hugh M. Cameron.
“That at the time of said accident the applicant was employed by the defendant in his real estate business in Oakland, California. That the applicant was paid a salary of sixty dollars per month, and in return for this amount was expected to perform certain services as directed, including the collection of rents, renting of houses,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sumner v. NevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Dillon v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Brown v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.