Legal Opinion
In re Womack
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 1, 2015No. 15-2379PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Christian Dior Womack, a.k.a. Gucci Prada, citing the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, presents a petition for a writ of mandamus. He describes claims relating to his criminal prosecution similar to those he raised in a previous mandamus petition, which we denied. See In re Womack, No. 15-2064, 606 Fed.Appx. 638, 2015 WL 3514707, 2015 U.S.App. LEXIS 9393 (3d Cir. June 5, 2015) (per curiam). Essentially, he asserts that his criminal prosecution, in which he pleaded guilty to charges of sex trafficking of a minor and sex trafficking by force, was a “complex fraud.”…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
4Cited by1 opinion
- TYLER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021