Legal Opinion

Covert v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1942No. 28764PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The sole question presented in this case is whether the reimbursement of a workmen’s compensation claimant for expenses actually incurred by him in making a trip to take a physical examination for the purpose of determining whether there was a continuing compensable injury or any basis for a claim entitling claimant to further compensation, constitutes a payment “of compensation or benefits,” within the meaning of Section 1465-86, General Code.

The pertinent portion of that section is as follows:

“* * * No such modification or change or any finding or award in respect of any claim whether filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garden Farm Dairy v. DorchakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Rahder v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Montgomery Ward & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Baughman v. Ohio Department of Public Safety Motor Vehicle SalvageOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bryant v. Montgomery Ward & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Cestone v. WylieOhio Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API