Legal Opinion

New London Instrument Co. v. Taffet

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Crisona, J.,

This is a motion hy the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The primary complaint, which must, of course, also he read on this motion (Vaughan v. Globe Neon Sign Co., 10 A D 2d 568), contains two identical causes of action. The first is asserted against the individual defendants, copartners doing business as Taffet Radio and Television Co., and the second is asserted against the corporate entity, Taffet Electronics, Inc., subsequently formed by them to carry on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. B. M. C. Manufacturing Corp. v. TarshisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howarth v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API