Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. City of Watertown

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner’s primary contention on appeal is that the provisions of the Watertown Code relating to the demolition of buildings violate the requirements of General City Law § 20 (35). Respondents concede that the provisions of the ordinance did not fully *1088comply with the requirement of notice to "persons having an interest” in the property to be demolished (General City Law § 20 [35] [b], [e]), and point out that the ordinance has been amended to conform to the statute. The inconsistency between the ordinance and the statute, however, did…