Legal Opinion

Rakhman v. Alco Realty I, L.P.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Debba A. James, J.

The motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment against defendants (1) declaring that so long as they receive a J-51 tax abatement, defendants, as owners of the buildings where plaintiffs reside, must accept Section 8 vouchers from plaintiffs, who are current tenants of such buildings; (2) ordering that defendants enter into a Housing Assistance Payment contract for each of their respective plaintiff tenants with the New York City Housing Authority and execute all other necessary related documents, including the standard lead paint disclosure form,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kosoglyadov v. 3130 Brighton Seventh, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Timkovsky v. 56 Bennett, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kosoglyadov v. 3130 Brighton Seventh, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rakhman v. Alco Realty I, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Florentino v. Nokit Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API