Legal Opinion

Chestnut v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 2006No. 4D06-143Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

Samuel Chestnut challenges a trial court order denying his motion for extension of time to file a renewed motion for postcon-viction DNA testing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. By previous order, following this court’s remand, the trial court issued an order permitting Chestnut to file a renewed rule 3.853 motion within sixty days. Chestnut v. State, 900 So.2d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Chesnut moved for an extension of that deadline.

The trial court denied the extension request as moot, reasoning that it was untimely. We find that the motion for…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haag v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Chestnut v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API