Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Calvert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1971No. 11791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff below, Appellant here, Humble Oil & Refining Company, paid the State of Texas, under protest, certain sums asserted by the State to be due it under Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 6032, Chapters 3 and 4, Title 122A, V.A.T.S., as a result of production by Humble of oil and gas from the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station lease. Humble brought this suit in accordance with Tex. Tax.-Gen. Ann. art. 1.05, Title 122A and art. 7057b, to recover such sums with interest earned thereon as provided by law.

At the time of the execution by the United States of the oil and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Humble Pipe Line Co. v. WaggonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Group No. 1 Oil Corp. v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. MRT Exploration Co. v. McNamaraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Bullock v. Mid-American Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1979
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API