Heafitz v. Interfirst Bank of Dallas
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action by a joint venturer for alleged tortious interference. Plaintiff Bruce Heafitz (“Heafitz”) entered a joint venture with four other individuals. The purpose of that venture was to acquire, develop and exploit certain oil and gas properties. Plaintiff alleges that InterFirst Bank of Dallas and Republic National Bank of Dallas (collectively “defendant banks”) induced his co-venturers to breach their fiduciary duties to the joint venture, and that those breaches caused him injury. He seeks damages and equitable relief.
Since the action was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc., and v. Santino D. Meo, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Joe P. Farina v. Mission Investment TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Riverside Park Realty Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jeretta Kay Tedford v. Warner-Lambert Co. Parke-Davis Division of Warner-Lambert Co. Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. Sankyo Parke-Davis Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Chavez v. KincaidDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
- Woburn Five Cents Savings Bank v. Robert M. Hicks, Inc., Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- American Home Assurance Co. v. RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.