Rehfuss v. Moore
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 3 OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 176 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 420 March Term 1888, C. P. No. 3. To the number and term in the court below, George Rehfuss and others, trading as George Rehfuss & Sons, brought assumpsit against Edward B. Moore and others, “ copartners, trading as the Automatic Overseaming Button-hole Machine Company, Limited,” to recover a balance alleged to be due from the defendants to…
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 3 OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 176 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 420 March Term 1888, C. P. No. 3. To the number and term in the court below, George Rehfuss and others, trading as George Rehfuss & Sons, brought assumpsit against Edward B. Moore and others, “ copartners, trading as the Automatic Overseaming Button-hole Machine Company, Limited,” to recover a balance alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiffs upon a contract for the manufacture of tools and machinery. The contract set out in plaintiffs’…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion,
Mr. Justice Clark:
The act of June 2, 1874, P. L. 271, requires persons desiring to form a limited partnership or association to file with the recorder of deeds a statement in writing, duly signed and acknowledged, in which shall he set forth: The full names of the persons associated, with the amount of capital subscribed by each; the total amount of the capital, and when and how to be paid; the character of the business, and the location of the same; the name of the association, with the word “Limited” added thereto; the contemplated duration of the association, not exceeding twenty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ager v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Maloney v. BruceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Gillett v. . BateNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Taylor v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Vanhorn v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Laflin & Rand Co. v. Steytler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
- Haslet v. KentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Wood v. SlomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907