Legal Opinion

Grindstone Indian Rancheria v. Olliff

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 24, 2021No. 2:17-cv-02292Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA No. 2:17-cv-02292-JAM-JDP and ONE HUNDRED PLUS MEN, 10 WOMEN AND CHILDREN LIVING ON THE GRINDSTONE INDIAN 11 RESERVATION, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE 12 Plaintiffs, COURT’S DENIAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 13 v. 14 TERRANCE OLLIFF, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 With their present motion,1 Plaintiffs attempt to take a 18 third bite at the apple. See Pls.’ Mot. for Relief (“Mot.”), ECF 19 No. 65. This attempt fails. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. United States v. Tommy Martin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Thoren v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Dykes v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API