Legal Opinion

Lena F. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1990No. 89-5433PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s decision affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of disability benefits. Because we find that substantial evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that plaintiff could perform light work before her disability benefits eligibility expired March 31, 1985, we affirm.

The claimant was 52 years of age at the time her insured status expired in March 1985. Claimant had primarily worked as a cashier/sales clerk from approximately 1950 until she quit working in January 1982, allegedly because of arthritis, chest pains, shortness of breath, chronic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarence STUDAWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Lawrence E. OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Carter v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Mary SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wirth v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Lowery v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. Mildred Liebisch v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Swett v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Kingery v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API