Legal Opinion

Taney v. Woodmansee

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The opinion of the Court contains a statement of the facts of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, President:

On the 2d day of September, 1882, in the chancery case of Emily F. Taney and James B. Taney, her husband, v. Louis Woodmansee and Susannah Lewis in the municipal court of Wheeling, the following decree was entered : “This cause came on this 2d day of September, A. I). 1882, to be finally heard ou the bill and exhibits, the joint answer of the defendants, the replication thereto, the report of Joseph R. Pauli, one of the commissioners of this court, the depositions filed with said repoi’t and the exceptions heretofore.submitted of the defendant, Louis Woodmansee, to said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winans v. WinansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. B. & O. R. R. v. VanderwarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowther v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Nutter v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bank of Union v. LoebWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hagan v. Dungannon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API