Legal Opinion

Stenger v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 31, 1927No. 11,497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In this action for damages against Stenger, as receiver for the Denver Tramway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while he was riding as a paying passenger in one of its cars, the plaintiff Arnold had judgment for $5,178.00 which the defendant in this review asks to have set aside. The accident happened on the Leyden suburban line on a regular trip from the town of Arvada to the city of Denver. Arnold it seems lived in Arvada and his place of work was in Denver and he used the street cars going to and returning from work and was familiar with this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. President of the Baltimore & Yorktown Turnpike Road v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. Jackson v. CrillySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Quinn v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API