People v. Stevey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, P. J.
Defendant Eddie Duane Stevey, convicted of various sex crimes against his 16-year-old victim, contends the interpretation of the *1404mixed DNA samples and the methodology used to project the probability of a DNA match constitute “new scientific technique[s]” requiring an evidentiary hearing to demonstrate they are generally accepted in the scientific community. (People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, 30 [130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d 1240] (Kelly).) In fact, it has been over 20 years since the first California appellate court concluded that the use of DNA for forensic purposes was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.