Legal Opinion

People v. Stevey

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2012No. C062760PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, P. J.

Defendant Eddie Duane Stevey, convicted of various sex crimes against his 16-year-old victim, contends the interpretation of the *1404mixed DNA samples and the methodology used to project the probability of a DNA match constitute “new scientific technique[s]” requiring an evidentiary hearing to demonstrate they are generally accepted in the scientific community. (People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, 30 [130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d 1240] (Kelly).) In fact, it has been over 20 years since the first California appellate court concluded that the use of DNA for forensic purposes was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. The People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API