Connelly v. Illinois Central Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.—lion. Leo 8. Rassieur, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence. Flynn v. Eailroad, 43 Mo. App. 424; Crouch v. Eailroad, 42 Mo. App. 248; Hurst v. Eailroad, 117 Mo. App. 25 ; Connelly v. Eailroad, 133-Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.—lion. Leo 8. Rassieur, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence. Flynn v. Eailroad, 43 Mo. App. 424; Crouch v. Eailroad, 42 Mo. App. 248; Hurst v. Eailroad, 117 Mo. App. 25 ; Connelly v. Eailroad, 133-Mo. App. 310. (2) The court erred in permitting the witness, Cunningham, to testify in the plaintiff’s behalf that the shipment in question was not properly loaded in the car: Heberling v. Warrensburg, 133 Mo. App. 544; G-allagher v. Tipton, 133 Mo. App. 557; Miller v. Canton, 112 Mo. App. 322; Eubank v. Edina, 88…
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.
This is the fourth appearance of this case in our court on appeal. Its history and the various incidents connected with it will be found reported, first, under the caption Connelly, Respondent, v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., Appellant; Southern Railway Company and Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, Defendants, 120 Mo. App. 652, 97 S. W. 616, the judgment then rendered against the Illinois Central Railroad Company being reversed and the cause remanded. Its second appearance is under the title Connelly, Appellant, v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Respondent, 133 Mo. App. 310, 113 S. W.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Connelly v. Illinois Central RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Connelly v. Illinois Central RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Connelly v. Illinois Central RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912