Legal Opinion

Vanech v. Hartsfield & Son, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1983No. 82-2511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment in this mechanic’s lien foreclosure and contract action. One contention raised by appellant is that the award of prejudgment interest was not proper because there was not a conclusive determination of the exact amount due at the time of appellees’ demand upon appellant for payment. We affirm the award of prejudgment interest as proper in a suit for payment of a debt due under a contract. See Parker v. Brinson Construction Co., 78 So.2d 873 (Fla.1955); Beckerman v. Greenbaum, 439 So.2d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Robinson v. Peterson, 375 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Peter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parker v. Brinson Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell & SonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Peter Marich & Associates, Inc. v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City Nat. Bank of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. CarreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craig R. Weiner Associates, Inc. v. SherdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Icard v. HendersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Valmor Distributors, Inc. v. Kanter Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API