Legal Opinion

Betty Anderson, and Naacp, Intervening v. City of Alpharetta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 17, 1985No. 85-8158PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal was brought initially by Janice Cook, Gloria Cook, and Mary Cook, plaintiffs below, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. (NAACP), as intervening plaintiff. On their application for an order dismissing the appeal as to them, the court has dismissed the Cooks from the case. This leaves the NAACP as the sole remaining appellant.

The district court dismissed the NAACP from the case because it lacked standing, both in its corporate and representative capacities, to bring the claims it alleged. We AFFIRM the dismissal for the reasons stated by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alfred L. Bochese v. Town of Ponce InletCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Florida State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. BrowningCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Jackson v. Okaloosa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Independent Housing Services v. Fillmore Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  5. Newark Branch v. Town of HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API