Legal Opinion

International Trust Co. v. Kruger

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

Sufficient facts are disclosed to show that special circumstances here exist which warrant and authorize the examination of this witness before trial. The “ special circumstances ” clause in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act should be liberally construed to advance the ends of justice and to provide for an orderly procedure at the trial. (McCullough v. Auditore, 216 App. Div. *860510; Mayer v. New York Canners, 217 id. 202; Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 id. 180.) Defendant has declined to disclose desired essential facts by pleading his constitutional privilege. This desired witness is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCullough v. AuditoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In re the Estate of DimonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. Rogalski v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API