Legal Opinion

McNulty v. Berry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 1956No. 36983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal involves the construction and interpretation of certain portions of the testatrix’ will and the distribution of property thereunder. In their briefs the parties identify plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, and defendant in error, as defendant.- This opinion will continue such mode of reference to the parties.

The judgment appealed from was entered by the District Court of Pawnee County after trial de novo on- appeal from the' County Court. ' -

The testatrix, Sarah Jane Mulléndote, a widow, was the mother of plaintiff and Bessie M. Johnson (whose interests herein conflict under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nusly v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Brady v. PaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Estate of McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. In Re Moran's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Perry v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Mullendore's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API