Legal Opinion · Dissent

Irle v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 12, 2013No. 2012-CA-00711-COAPublished

1DissentIrving, P.J.

¶ 28. The majority finds that the chancery court did not err in awarding custody of Britney, Irle’s oldest child, to the Fosters, Britney’s paternal grandparents. Because I believe that the chancery court’s determinatión — that the evidence presented by the Fosters clearly rebutted the natural-parent presumption accorded Irle — was manifestly wrong and clearly erroneous, I dissent. I would reverse and render the judgment of the chancery court.

¶ 29. It is well established that“[i]n [a] custody battle[ ] between a natural parent and a third party.... the third party must first clearly rebut the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Carter v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In re Smith v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. S.C.R. v. F.W.KMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Brumfield v. BrumfieldCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API