Legal Opinion
Monarch Photo, Inc. v. Qualex, Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 27, 1996No. 4:02-k-00001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
On November 4,1991, the Defendant, Qua-lex, purchased the wholesale photofinishing business of the Plaintiff, Monarch Photo. 1 Ex. 1. The majority of the purchase price was for the obtaining of customer lists and contracts between Monarch and its wholesale customers. Id., 4. The parties also signed an “Ancillary Services Agreement” which was to take effect on January 2, 1992. 2 Ex. 3. In essence, the Ancillary Agreement sought to provide Monarch with a five-year income stream as it refocused the concentration of its business…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Bismarck Realty Co. v. FoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Cargill, Incorporated v. Taylor Towing Service, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Air Heaters, Inc. v. Johnson Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BerneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Westpoint Stevens, Inc. v. Panda-Rosemary Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 1999