Legal Opinion

People v. Rosales

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1979No. Docket 62398Published

1Opinion of the Court

406 Mich. 624 (1979)

281 N.W.2d 126

PEOPLE

v.

ROSALES

Docket No. 62398.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 25, 1979.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert L. Kaczmarek, Prosecuting Attorney, and Linda Berns Wright, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

State Appellate Defender (by Kathleen M. Cummins) for defendant.

2Per curiam

The question before us is how far the permissible stop-and-frisk of Terry v Ohio[1] extends in an automobile context. When the record does not show that the search was prompted by the officer's fear of violence while pursuing his…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API