Gulf Refining Co. v. Stone
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION.
Roberds, J.,
delivered a partially dissenting opinion.
I agree that the tax in question is valid as to the Gulf Refining Company itself, but not for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. For centuries the term “land” has included not only the surface of the soil but everything beneath it in its natural state. This includes all minerals under the surface. Fox v. Pearl River Lumber Co., 80 Miss. 1, 31 So. 583; Moss v. Jourdan, 129 Miss. 598, 92 So. 689; Stern v. Great Southern Land Co., 148 Miss. 649, 114 So. 739; Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Cooper, 190…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Jensen v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Ohio Oil Co. v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Pace v. State Ex Rel. RiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.