Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1978PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*849Appellant insurer is precluded from seeking a judicial stay of arbitration inasmuch as its application therefor was not properly served within the 20 days prescribed by statute (CPLR 7503, subd [c]). Additionally the payment by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of the full $10,000 under the standard New York uninsured motorist indorsement, while relevant to the consideration and determination of the claims of the parties by the arbitrator, is unrelated to appellant’s commitment to submit such claims…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & VitucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re the Arbitration between Nassau Insurance & ClementeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API