Legal Opinion

Doe v. Lai-Yet Lam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 4, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered on or about October 21, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant hospital’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and order, same court and Justice, entered May 28, 1999, which, insofar as appealable, denied the hospital’s motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s mother, while pregnant with plaintiff, had blood drawn at defendant hospital for routine prenatal testing. The hospital’s lab performed a required hepatitis B…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Mikel v. Flatbush General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Harvey v. CramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BAGLEY, GILBERT v. ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITALAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Bagley v. Rochester General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Bagley v. Rochester General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API