Legal Opinion

New v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1941No. 21339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, death.

The case was tried upon the theory that Jim Johnson had sexual intercourse with Willie Joe Winchester, a girl under fifteen years of age, with her consent and that appellant, while present, and knowing the unlawful intent of Johnson, encouraged him by words in the Commission of the unlawful act.

Prosecutrix was the step-daughter of the appellant, and, according to her testimony, became fourteen years of age on the 22nd of April, 1940. She lived in the home of her mother and the' appellant, where the offense occurred. It was her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Cloninger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Kerr v. United StatesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  3. Kruger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Kruger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API