Anne S. v. Peter S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*484Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the determination denying her application to relocate lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of David J.B. v Monique H., 52 AD3d 414 [2008]) or that relocation would be in the children’s best interests (see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 740-741 [1996]). She failed to demonstrate that relocation was warranted based on economic necessity (compare Matter of Harrsch v Jesser, 74 AD3d 811 [2010]) or that she would receive increased support in Luxembourg from her extended family, who live nearby in Luxembourg and France (compare…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Neuman v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- David J.B. v. Monique H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Solomon v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Amato v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- HIRSCHMAN, NICHOLE M. v. MCFADDEN, PATRICK R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016