Legal Opinion

Anne S. v. Peter S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*484Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the determination denying her application to relocate lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of David J.B. v Monique H., 52 AD3d 414 [2008]) or that relocation would be in the children’s best interests (see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 740-741 [1996]). She failed to demonstrate that relocation was warranted based on economic necessity (compare Matter of Harrsch v Jesser, 74 AD3d 811 [2010]) or that she would receive increased support in Luxembourg from her extended family, who live nearby in Luxembourg and France (compare…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Neuman v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. David J.B. v. Monique H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Solomon v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Amato v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HIRSCHMAN, NICHOLE M. v. MCFADDEN, PATRICK R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API