Legal Opinion

R. K. O. Pictures, Inc. v. Hissong

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided July 31, 1954No. 189797Published

1Opinion of the Court

*496OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

The plaintiffs seek to restrain the enforcement of the Motion Picture Censorship Laws of Ohio. (Secs. 3305.01— 3305.99, inclusive, R. C.) These statutes require each motion picture film shall be submitted to the defendant for examination and censorship prior to public exhibition in Ohio; and provide that “only such films as are, in the judgment and discretion of the department of education, of a moral, educational, or amusing and harmless character shall be passed and approved by such department.” The fees required to be paid for such examination, are $3.00 for each 1000…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API