Legal Opinion
Boyadjian v. CIGNA COMPANIES
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 6, 1998No. Civ.A.95-4453 (MLP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PARELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motion by plaintiff pro se Robert Boyadjian (“Boyadjian”) for costs pursuant to Local Rule 54.1. For the reasons-expressed in this Memorandum Opinion, plaintiffs motion is' granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The facts underlying the instant action are set forth in detail in this Court’s Opinion filed July 29, 1997. In the interest of clarity, we will briefly restate them here. . Plaintiff commenced this action on August 21, 1995, seeking relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act .of 1974…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Radford Trust v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Boisvert v. SearsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998