Legal Opinion

Rogers, Brown & Co. v. Citizens' National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This controversy arises upon the distribution of the assets of the Campbell & Zell Company of Baltimore City, a corporation of the State of Maryland, and now in the hands of its receiver, Charles C. Homer, in the Circuit Court of Baltimore.

There is no dispute as to the facts of the case, and in so far as they bear upon the questions presented for our consideration, are set forth in the record by “ an agreed statement of facts.” The questions relate solely to the distribution of the funds of the corporation among its creditors and which are now held by the receiver. The facts appear from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heller, Hirsch & Co. v. National Marine BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Thruston v. DevecmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  4. Third National Bank v. LanahanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Woollen v. HillenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  2. Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Van Dyk & Reeves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. National Marine Bank v. Heller, Hirsh & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Blakistone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Ward v. State Ex Rel. SchlosserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API