Legal Opinion

Goetz-Haddad v. Pathmark Supermarkets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered October 30, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the action was not commenced until well after the running of the applicable statute of limitations (see CPLR 215 [3]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986];…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Schetzen v. RobotsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Wertzberger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Friedman v. GallinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Rutzinger v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. RiccuitiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API