Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided July 3, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Edward Paul Kreiling City Attorney City of Miramar Post Office Box 3838 Miramar, Florida 33023

Dear Mr. Kreiling:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on the use of sole source specifications in the construction or repair of public buildings. Your questions can be consolidated as follows:

MAY A CITY COUNCIL OR OTHER CITY OFFICIAL SPECIFY A PARTICULAR PRODUCT BY MANUFACTURER NAME AND MODEL FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION, ALTERATION, OR REPAIR OF A PUBLICLY OWNED FACILITY IF THE SPECIFICATION ALLOWS THE USE OF AN EQUIVALENT PRODUCT OR SPECIFY PARTICULAR PRODUCTS OR…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EganSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Reino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Tropical Coach Line, Inc. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  4. Wagner v. BottsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Southeastern Utilities Service Company v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API