Legal Opinion
Doe v. Chenango Valley Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.
“In order to recover against an employer for negligent retention [or negligent supervision] of an employee, a plaintiff must show that ‘the employer was on notice of a propensity to commit the alleged acts’ ” (G.G. v Yonkers Gen. Hosp., 50 AD3d 472 [2008], quoting White v Hampton Mgt. Co. L.L.C., 35 AD3d 243, 244 [2006]; see Gray v Schenectady City School Dist., 86 AD3d *1017771, 773 [2011]). Here, defendant claimed that it had no reason to believe that Setzer was unfit to serve as a school bus operator and, therefore, summary judgment dismissing the entire complaint against it was warranted.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- White v. Hampton Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gray v. Schenectady City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Romero v. YMCA of Greater Malone Development Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stevens v. KellarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hicks v. Berkshire Farm Center & Services for YouthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hicks v. Berkshire Farm Center & Services for YouthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kelly G. v. Board of Education of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Kelly G. v. Board of Education of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.