Legal Opinion

Acustar, Inc. v. Staples

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 6, 1992No. 2900460PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

Marcia Staples filed an action against Chrysler Motors Corporation (Chrysler) alleging that she incurred a compensable injury while working for Chrysler. She later amended the complaint to name Acustar, Inc., (Acustar), as her true employer and to include allegations regarding other injuries on other dates. Following the presentation of ore tenus evidence, the trial court entered a lengthy and thorough order finding, inter alia, that Staples suffered permanent, partial disability and loss of earning capacity of 50%, and awarded her compensation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Defense Ordinance Corporation v. EnglandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Blue Circle, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Wolfe v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Golden Poultry Co., Inc. v. StaggsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. M.C. Dixon Lumber Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API