Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Meeks
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Hemphill County; Frank Willis, Judge. Action by M. M. Meeks against the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company, R. T. Stuart and Coke W. Hark-rider, as individuals, acting under the firm names of Stuart, Harkrider & Co., and the Commonwealth Organization Company, and others, with cross-action by the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Hemphill County; Frank Willis, Judge. Action by M. M. Meeks against the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company, R. T. Stuart and Coke W. Hark-rider, as individuals, acting under the firm names of Stuart, Harkrider & Co., and the Commonwealth Organization Company, and others, with cross-action by the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff against the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company and R. T. Stuart, and the company appeals, and Stuart brings writ of error.
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
[11-13] In the original opinion we held that there was no evidence in the record tending to show that stock in a corporation, organized under the laws of Texas, would be more desirable or valuable than stock in a corporation organized under the laws of Arizona. In motion for rehearing, appellee has *686called to our attention Ms own testimony from the statement of facts, as follows:
“He (McOowan, the stock salesman) said this was to be a Texas corporation, and we went into details about the Texas corporation laws, about the advantage Texas laws had over other states. I…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. Fort Worth Board of TradeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Collinson v. JefferiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. CatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915