Legal Opinion

Babbitt v. Shade

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGieger, J.

This matter is now pending on an application for rehearing. The action was based upon an injunction. The court in the opinion heretofore rendered, held:

“An action by injunction is premature and may be resorted to by an incumbent of a public office only to protect his position against the interference of an adverse claimant whose title is in dispute. It is not an appropriate remedy to try the title or determine questions concerning the authority to make appointments thereto.”

It was ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be dismissed on the ground that the facts pleaded did not entitle…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. STATE Ex STALEY v. LAKEWOOD (City) EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Marion County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. City of MiddletownOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Kraft v. City of MassillonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Remitz v. RemitzMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State, Ex Rel. Brubaker v. HardyOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API