State v. Central of Georgia Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The State appeals from a condemnation award. Counsel for the State urges two points for reversal: (1) lay witnesses were allowed to testify as to value of the two condemned tracts, and (2) the verdict was excessive.
We have examined the record and find that each of the lay witnesses tes tified that they were generally familiar with the property and each stated that he had an opinion as to the value of the parcels. A person is competent to give his opinion as to value if he has had an opportunity to form a correct opinion and testifies, in substance, that he has done so. State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rountree Farm Co. v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- State v. WoodhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- State v. RigasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- State v. Wise Development CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- Florence v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- State v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Nicrosi v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- State v. Wise Development CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.