Legal Opinion
Barrington v. Pacific S. S. Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 17, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoeverton, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The action is predicated upon section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 1007), which provides, among other things:
“That any seaman who shall suffer personal injury in the course of his employment may, at his election, maintain an action for damages at law, (vith the right of trial by jury. * * * Jurisdiction in such actions shall be under the court of the district in which the defendant employer resides or in which his principal office is located.”
It is clear that this court is without jurisdiction of the parties, neither of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ware-Kramer Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1910
- Johnson v. Panama R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Panama R. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Lorang v. Alaska S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- Petterson v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.