Legal Opinion

Sargent v. State Banking & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1926No. 7199Published

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Defendant in< error brought this action against plaintiffs in error in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa, to-recover on a certain promissory note executed by Sargent and Evans, as makers, to one-Kinney, as payee, and indorsed by said Kin*759ney and by R. E. Conklin, H. H. Carey, Irwin Beaumont, and R. B. Weakley, who (except Beaumont and Weakley) are plaintiffs in error herein. Eor brevity’s sake, the parties will be referred to hereinafter, as plaintiff and defendants, as they were styled below.

Plaintiff and Weakley were, at the time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Brown v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Newgass v. City of New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1888
  4. Herr v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909
  5. Hostetter v. SymesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API