Legal Opinion

Animal Welfare Institute v. Martin

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 20, 2009No. CV-08-267-B-WPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED 1 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief District Judge.

This exhaustively litigated case is in order for decision. Frustrated by the Court’s failure to issue a ruling on the pending motion for preliminary injunction before the commencement of the early coyote and fox trapping season in the state of Maine, the Plaintiffs have filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a motion for temporary restraining order. The Court denies each motion.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On August 11, 2008, Animal Welfare Institute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Monroig-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Bl(a)ck Tea Society v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Northwest Bypass Group v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Animal Welfare Institute v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monga v. Nat'l Endowment for the ArtsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  2. ALCOM LLC v. TEMPLEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  3. DOUGLAS v. LALUMIEREDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  4. DOUGLAS v. LALUMIEREDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  5. WE THE PEOPLE PAC v. DUNLAPDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API