Gould v. Soto
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CUNNINGHAM, J.—This
is a statutory action in the nature of an action in ejectment commenced by the appellees *559against the appellants in the court below to recover for the estate of Altagracia Ochoa, deceased, the possession of lots 5 and 9 of block 230 of the Tucson townsite, together with rent therefor alleged to be overdue. The complaint is in substantially the form' employed in such actions, and among other things alleges that Silas Gould, as the minor son of Silas H. and Silvester Gould, and the defendants are members of and constitute one family. It is further alleged that Silas H. Gould…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Hoskins v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Johnson v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 4501 NORTHPOINT LP v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Corbett v. KinganArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Osterhaus Pharmacy Incorporated v. CVS Health CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025