Legal Opinion

Buffalo Dump Truck Owners Ass'n v. Condon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Even if mandamus were the proper remedy under the facts here, the procedure followed would be open to serious objections. No “ moneys ” were held “ in trust ” for petitioner by Condon, chief clerk, Division of Highways. The moneys due on the contract were held by the State. Nor was the check, which had been drawn but not delivered, in Condon’s possession as trustee for petitioner. It was in his possession merely in connection with his routine clerical duties. His possession was the possession of the Division of Highways of the Department of Public Works. If there *274Was any duty here,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. John L. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Durant v. WhedonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. In Re Bohnet v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Hansen v. LuderaNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API