New Bern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blalock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from Whedbee, J., at April Term, 1912, of Graven. Tie facts are sufficiently stated in tie opinion of tie Court by ' Mr. Chief Justice Clark.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, 0. J.
Controversy submitted without action. Tie defendant R. B. Blalock, on 1 April, 1903, subscribed for $1,500 in tie capital stock of plaintiff Building and Loan Association. On 1 June, 1903, ie borrowed tie sum of $1,500, and as security for said loan assigned said stock as collateral security, and as additional security ie and his wife executed a deed in trust on certain realty. In February, 1909, tie directors of tie plaintiff company discovered that tie association had lost a sum of money which would require two additional monthly payments on each share of stock to make good said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meroney v. Atlanta Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Strauss v. Carolina Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Strauss v. Carolina Interstate Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Thompson v. North Carolina Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Meares v. . DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shuford v. Blue Ridge Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Rendleman v. . StoesselSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Meares v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897