Legal Opinion

New Bern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blalock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Whedbee, J., at April Term, 1912, of Graven. Tie facts are sufficiently stated in tie opinion of tie Court by ' Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

Controversy submitted without action. Tie defendant R. B. Blalock, on 1 April, 1903, subscribed for $1,500 in tie capital stock of plaintiff Building and Loan Association. On 1 June, 1903, ie borrowed tie sum of $1,500, and as security for said loan assigned said stock as collateral security, and as additional security ie and his wife executed a deed in trust on certain realty. In February, 1909, tie directors of tie plaintiff company discovered that tie association had lost a sum of money which would require two additional monthly payments on each share of stock to make good said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meroney v. Atlanta Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Strauss v. Carolina Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Strauss v. Carolina Interstate Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Thompson v. North Carolina Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Meares v. . DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shuford v. Blue Ridge Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Rendleman v. . StoesselSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Meares v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API